Legal Opinion

Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1966No. L. A. 28897PublishedCited by 1,047 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTobriner, J.

This is an action by an insured against his insurer for failure to defend an action filed against him which stemmed from a complaint alleging that he had committed an assault. The main issue turns on the argument of the insurer that an exclusionary clause of the policy excuses its defense of an action in which a plaintiff alleges that *267the insured intentionally caused the bodily injury. Yet the language of the policy does not clearly define the application of the exclusionary clause to the duty to defend. Since in that event we test the meaning of the policy according to the insured’s…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Continental Casualty Co. v. Phoenix Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Steven v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.California Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Arenson v. National Automobile & Casualty InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Neal v. State Farm Insurance CompaniesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1961

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1,047 opinions

  1. Waller v. Truck Insurance Exchange, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Bank of the West v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Buss v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997

1,042 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API