Prince & Princess Enterprises, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Health Services
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 In this appeal we interpret an exception to the Smoke-Free Arizona Act, Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S”) section 36-601.01 (Supp.2007). We hold that a business which satisfies the definition of a “retail tobacco store” under § 36-601.01(A)(10) qualifies for the statutory retail tobacco store exception to the smoking ban, even if the store also holds a liquor license and sells alcohol on its premises.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶2 Appellant Prince and Princess Enterprises, LLC (“Magnum’s”) is the owner and operator of Magnum’s Cigar, Wine & Liquor Emporium. Magnum’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. LeonardoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Buencamino v. NoftsingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.