Legal Opinion

Prince & Princess Enterprises, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Health Services

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 15, 2009No. 1 CA-CV 08-0151 APublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 In this appeal we interpret an exception to the Smoke-Free Arizona Act, Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S”) section 36-601.01 (Supp.2007). We hold that a business which satisfies the definition of a “retail tobacco store” under § 36-601.01(A)(10) qualifies for the statutory retail tobacco store exception to the smoking ban, even if the store also holds a liquor license and sells alcohol on its premises.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 Appellant Prince and Princess Enterprises, LLC (“Magnum’s”) is the owner and operator of Magnum’s Cigar, Wine & Liquor Emporium. Magnum’s…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  2. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Calik v. KongableArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2005

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. LeonardoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Buencamino v. NoftsingerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  4. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  5. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API