Legal Opinion

City of Mesa v. Killingsworth

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1964No. 8160PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

This is an original action in mandamus seeking to compel respondents to collect and apportion certain excise taxes in the manner petitioners believe the applicable law requires. We issued an alternative writ of mandamus, A.R.S.Const. Art. 6, § 5, as amended, allowing the parties an appropriate period of time to file, briefs.

The controversy arises out of the 1963 amendments to the Motor Vehicle Fuel Tax, Article 1, Ch. 9 of Title 28, of the Arizona Revised Statutes, § 28-1501 et seq., and the Use Fuel Tax, Article 2, Ch. 9 of Title 28, A.R.S. § 28-1551 et seq. Both…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Roberts v. SprayArizona Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Automatic Registering MacHine Co. v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  3. City of Tombstone v. MacIaArizona Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Long v. DickArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  5. State Board of Technical Registration v. McDanielArizona Supreme Court · 1958

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API