Buencamino v. Noftsinger
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 Jovi Buencamino (“Father”) appeals the family court’s order awarding him joint custody rather than sole custody of his daughter, C.P., after Floricel Noftsinger (“Mother”) had moved to Maryland. In this opinion, we explain that the relocation provisions of Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 25^408 (2007) are not applicable under these facts. In a separate memorandum decision, we explain that the family court’s findings under A.R.S. §§ 25^403 (2007) and - 403.01 (2007) in support of joint custody were sufficient. 1 For these reasons, we affirm the order.
FACTS…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Nordstrom, Inc. v. Maricopa CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- City of Phoenix v. HarnishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
- DeVries v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- Prince & Princess Enterprises, LLC v. State Ex Rel. Arizona Department of Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bither v. Country Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
- Berrier v. RountreeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
- Eastman v. EastmanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Johnson v. ProvoyeurCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- Robertson v. BucknerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.