Legal Opinion

Calik v. Kongable

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1999No. CV-98-0389-PRPublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FELDMAN, Justice.

¶ 1 We granted review to determine whether the initiative proposal adopted as Proposition 200 prohibits a trial court from imposing jail time as a condition of probation for a person convicted of first-offense personal possession or use of a controlled substance. We hold that incarceration may not be imposed under such circumstances.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶2 In 1996, voters approved an initiative proposal known as Proposition 200, the Drug Medicalization, Prevention, and Control Act of 1996, which made changes to Arizona’s law as it pertained to persons convicted…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Hayes v. Continental InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. San Carlos Apache Tribe v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Leonard H. v. Beneficial Arizona, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Randolph v. GroscostArizona Supreme Court · 1999

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. State v. EstradaArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  2. State v. ChristianArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State Ex Rel. Romley v. MartinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. United States v. Alejandro Robles-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API