State v. Leonardo
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KELLY, Judge.
¶ 1 In this special action, the State of Arizona seeks relief from the respondent judge’s order compelling C.M., whom Mark Gannon had been convicted of molesting, to submit to an interview by defense counsel in a separate criminal prosecution involving another victim. The state maintains the respondent judge erred in concluding that C.M. was no longer a victim within the meaning of the Victim’s Bill of Rights (VBR) set forth in the Arizona Constitution. We accept jurisdiction and, because we agree that C.M. retains her victim’s rights while Gannon is on probation, grant…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. RoqueArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. SweetArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Hobson v. Mid-Century InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Coy v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Norgord v. State Ex Rel. BerningCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Hirsch v. Arizona Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Rasmussen v. MungerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- Alex Paul Rasmussen v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
- In Re Reynaldo P.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.