Legal Opinion

Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 18, 2013No. 1 CA-IC 12-0018PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) award and decision upon review granting reimbursement — often called “apportionment” — under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1065(C)(3)(e) (Supp. 2012), in favor of the Employer and Carrier against Petitioner Special Fund Division. The injured worker, Karen Lane, has a pre-exist-ing congenital condition of her hands known as syndactyly.1 The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granted apportionment based on Lane’s syndactyly, concluding that the syndactyly qualified under § 23…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Stout v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
  2. Pendergast v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
  5. McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API