Special Fund Division v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GEMMILL, Judge.
¶ 1 This is a special action review of an Industrial Commission of Arizona (“ICA”) award and decision upon review granting reimbursement — often called “apportionment” — under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 23-1065(C)(3)(e) (Supp. 2012), in favor of the Employer and Carrier against Petitioner Special Fund Division. The injured worker, Karen Lane, has a pre-exist-ing congenital condition of her hands known as syndactyly.1 The administrative law judge (“ALJ”) granted apportionment based on Lane’s syndactyly, concluding that the syndactyly qualified under § 23…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Young v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. GomezArizona Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. WiseArizona Supreme Court · 1983
- NEW SUN BUSINESS PARK, LLC v. Yuma CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Stout v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- Pendergast v. Arizona State Retirement SystemCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Special Fund Division v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
- McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil ServiceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2022
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.