Legal Opinion

Urias v. PCS Health Systems, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 18, 2005No. 1 CA-CV 03-0717PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

GEMMILL, Judge.

¶ 1 Premier Healthcare, Inc., an insurer, owed money to PCS Health Systems, Inc. for prescription drug reimbursement payments. PCS had gathered volume discount rebates from drug manufacturers and was obligated to pay eighty-five percent of the rebates to Premier. After Premier was placed into receivership, PCS asserted the right under Arizona Revised Statutes (“A.R.S.”) section 20-638(A) (2002) to retain the rebate funds owed to Premier as an offset against Premier’s indebtedness to PCS. To decide whether this offset is authorized, we must determine if the obligations…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Citizens Bank of Md. v. StrumpfSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Studley v. Boylston National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  3. Taylor v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993
  4. In the Matter of ENERGY COOPERATIVE, INC., a Delaware Corporation, Bankrupt-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  5. Beecher v. Peter A. Vogt Manufacturing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Cook v. Orkin Exterminating Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. Goodman v. Physical Resource Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Aztar Corp. v. U.S. Fire InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  4. Quintero Community Ass'n v. Federal Deposit InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
  5. City of Phoenix v. HarnishCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API