Legal Opinion
BHP Land Services, LLC v. Seymour
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided July 31, 2012No. AC 33294PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GRUENDEL,
J. The defendant Jean Seymour1 appeals from the judgment of the trial court in favor of the plaintiff, BHP Land Services, LLC. The defendant claims that the court improperly found that the plaintiff could recover on theories of unjust enrichment and quantum meruit. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The court found the following facts. In 2003, the defendant purchased the property in question, which is located in Enfield (property).2 The property consists of a house, a horse bam and pasture land of about eighteen to nineteen acres. The defendant has never *167resided at the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- United Coastal Industries, Inc. v. Clearheart Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Cuozzo v. Town of OrangeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- 300 State, LLC v. HanafinConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Noyes v. Antiques at Pompey Hollow, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Hospital of Central Connecticut v. Neurosurgical Associates, P.C.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2015