Legal Opinion
Cuozzo v. Town of Orange
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 17, 2013No. AC 34918PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KELLER, J.
The main issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly dismissed a claim for lack of subject matter jurisdiction on the ground that the plaintiff failed to provide notice to a municipality in accordance with the municipal highway defect statute, General Statutes § 13a-149. The plaintiff, Armand Cuozzo, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his complaint against the defendant, the town of Orange.1 The plaintiff claims that the court improperly granted the defendant’s motion to dismiss. We agree with the plaintiff and reverse the judgment of the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Barde v. Board of TrusteesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Mahoney v. LensinkSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Baker v. IvesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Ferreira v. PringleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Hewison v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1867
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Giannoni v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Cuozzo v. Town of OrangeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- Cuozzo v. OrangeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
- Escourse v. 100 Taylor Avenue, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2014
- Giannoni v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.