Legal Opinion
300 State, LLC v. Hanafin
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 22, 2013No. AC 34042PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DiPENTIMA, C. J.
The defendant, Diarmuid Hanafin, doing business as Hanafin’s, appeals from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, 300 State, LLC. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly awarded damages for his use and occupancy of the premises leased to him by the plaintiff because the plaintiff failed to introduce any evidence and the court did not find the reasonable value of the premises. We conclude that the court properly rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff with respect to its breach of lease claim. Accordingly, we affirm the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Chapman Lumber, Inc. v. TagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Sosin v. SosinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- United Coastal Industries, Inc. v. Clearheart Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Meribear Prods., Inc. v. FrankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Nation Electrical Contracting, LLC v. St. Dimitrie Romanian Orthodox ChurchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Ed Lally & Associates, Inc. v. DSBNC, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013