Noyes v. Antiques at Pompey Hollow, LLC
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The defendants, Antiques at Pompey Hollow, LLC, and Thomas Degnan, appeal from the judgment of the trial court rendered in favor of the plaintiff, Daphne B. Noyes, following a trial to the court. On appeal, the defendants claim that the court improperly found that they (1) were unjustly enriched and (2) had *584violated the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA), General Statutes § 42-110a et seq. The defendants also claim that the court improperly awarded the plaintiff attorney’s fees pursuant to CUTPA. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The following facts, as…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Cheshire Mortgage Service, Inc. v. MontesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Giulietti v. GiuliettiConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Hartford Electric Supply Co. v. Allen-Bradley Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Bhatia v. DebekSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- United Cleaning & Restoration, LLC v. KoskeridesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Pearlman v. GervolinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025
- Pearlman v. GervolinoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2025