Gagne v. Vaccaro
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
The principal issue in this appeal is whether, in the absence of a written contingency fee agreement between an attorney and his client, as required by General Statutes § 52-251c,1 recovery by that attorney *392against a successor attorney should be permitted on the basis of quantum meruit or unjust enrichment, regardless of whether bad faith by the successor attorney or the client’s waiver of § 52-251c has been established. We conclude that, under the facts and circumstances of this case, the failure by the plaintiff, J. William Gagne, Jr., to comply with § 52-251c did not…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Petyan v. EllisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by88 opinions
- Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- United Coastal Industries, Inc. v. Clearheart Construction Co.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2002
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.