Legal Opinion
Gagne v. Vaccaro
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 9, 2003No. AC 22872PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
McLACHLAN, J.
This case returns to us following a remand to the trial court by the Supreme Court. In this appeal, the defendant, Enrico Vaccaro, claims the trial court improperly (1) denied his motion to open and to set aside the judgment, (2) awarded the plaintiff offer of judgment interest and (3) granted the plaintiffs prejudgment remedy of attachment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
This action between attorneys originated in a personal injury matter. The plaintiff, J. William Gagne, Jr., brought an action to recover damages for the defendant’s failure to pay him a portion…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Breen v. PhelpsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Fink v. GolenbockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
- Meehan v. Cheltenham TownshipSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
- United States Trust Co. v. BohartSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Mickey v. MickeySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Edmands v. Cuno, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.