Legal Opinion
United Coastal Industries, Inc. v. Clearheart Construction Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 13, 2002No. AC 21610PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUPONT, J.
The issues in this appeal are whether the plaintiff subcontractor, in an action against the defendant contractor, can recover as restitution, in quantum meruit or unjust enrichment for work done in partial completion of the work encompassed by their written contract, and, if so, the proper amount of damages. We conclude that the remedy of restitution was proper and that the amount of damages was calculated properly. We therefore affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The defendant contractor, Clearheart Construction Company, Inc. (Clearheart), and the plaintiff subcontractor,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Burns v. KoellmerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
- Vines v. Orchard Hills, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Polverari v. PeattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Avis Rent a Car Systems, Inc. v. HeilmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Interbank Investments, LLC v. Eagle River Water & Sanitation DistrictColorado Court of Appeals · 2003
- Russell v. RussellConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005
- Scrushy v. TuckerSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006
- Gagne v. VaccaroConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.