Legal Opinion
Hartford Whalers Hockey Club v. Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided November 8, 1994No. 15004PublishedCited by 96 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBorden, J.
The defendants appeal1 from the judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the plaintiff after a court trial. The plaintiff, Hartford Whalers Hockey Club, sued the defendants, The Uniroyal Goodrich Tire Company (Uniroyal) and Uniroyal, Inc.,2 for amounts allegedly owed for advertising during the 1987-88 hockey season. The plaintiff asserted two theories of recovery against the defendants: (1) express contract between the plaintiff and the defendants based upon the apparent authority of the defendants’ agent, Brass City Tire Company, Inc. (Brass City); and (2) unjust enrichment. The…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hamm v. TaylorSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Providence Electric Co. v. Sutton Place, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1971
- Schleicher v. SchleicherSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
- Franks v. LockwoodSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Polverari v. PeattConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Vertex, Inc. v. City of WaterburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Town of New Hartford v. Connecticut Resources Recovery AuthoritySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Gagne v. VaccaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Quinn v. Walgreen Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 2013
- Weisman v. KasparSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.