Legal Opinion
City of Minneapolis v. Meldahl
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided March 14, 2000No. C6-99-1490PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HUSPENI, Judge.
On appeal from a dismissal for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction, appellant Steven Meldahl contends the district court erred because (1) appellant properly brought his inverse condemnation claim in district court and (2) the record was inadequate for certiorari review. Because under the circumstances of this matter, appellant could obtain review of the quasi-judicial decision only through certiorari review by the court of appeals, we affirm.
FACTS
A Minneapolis housing inspector condemned the building at issue after the owner failed to abate housing code violations. The…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Alevizos v. Metropolitan Air. Com'n of Mpls. & St. P.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1974
- Thomsen v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
- Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
- Zeman v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- American Family Insurance v. City of MinneapolisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
- Nolan and Nolan v. City of EaganCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Rostamkhani v. City of St. PaulCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Mark R. Zweber v. Credit River TownshipSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2016
- In re the Rental Dwelling License held by KhanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.