Legal Opinion

Lam v. City of St. Paul

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided May 30, 2006No. A05-1706PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COLLINS, Judge. *

In this certiorari appeal from a St. Paul City Council decision, relators contend that the city council’s denial of relators’ license applications should be reversed and that this court has jurisdiction to decide the dispute. Because the city council’s decision was quasi-judicial, jurisdiction is proper in this court. Because the land use permitted by the conditional-use permit was not extinguished just because certain business activity ceased, we reverse.

FACTS

Relators Chan Lam and Ha Tran, d/b/a Ha Auto Repair, challenge respondent St. Paul City Council’s denial of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  3. Willis v. County of SherburneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Wajda v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Hooper v. City of St. PaulSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. White v. City of Elk RiverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Guardian Interlock Systems, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Public SafetyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API