City of Hibbing v. Baratto
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over her claim that the City of Hibbing arbitrarily denied her request for a variance to build a garage. Because we find the court’s jurisdiction determined by an applicable statute, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.
FACTS
Appellant started to build a garage because she believed her original informal contact with the city was sufficient to comply with the zoning ordinances. In fact, she had not sought or received a variance. When she did apply for a variance, after…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
- Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- Curry v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Semler Construction, Inc. v. City of HanoverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
- Carlson v. ChermakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002