Legal Opinion

City of Hibbing v. Baratto

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 19, 2000No. C6-00-833PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the trial court’s determination that it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over her claim that the City of Hibbing arbitrarily denied her request for a variance to build a garage. Because we find the court’s jurisdiction determined by an applicable statute, we reverse and remand for further proceedings.

FACTS

Appellant started to build a garage because she believed her original informal contact with the city was sufficient to comply with the zoning ordinances. In fact, she had not sought or received a variance. When she did apply for a variance, after…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Honn v. City of Coon RapidsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  2. Interstate Power Co. v. Nobles County Board of CommissionersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  3. White Bear Rod and Gun Club v. City of HugoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Handicraft Block Ltd. Partnership v. City of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
  5. Curry v. YoungSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Semler Construction, Inc. v. City of HanoverCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003
  2. Carlson v. ChermakCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API