Legal Opinion

State v. Tokheim

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided June 13, 2000No. C2-99-1776PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHUMAKER, Judge

Two Minnesota state troopers were sued and they asked the commissioner of public safety to indemnify and defend them. After reviewing written submissions of outside counsel, the commissioner refused to indemnify the troopers, finding that they were acting outside the scope of their employment.

The state filed a separate declaratory judgment, seeking a declaration that it need not indemnify the troopers. The district court granted the state’s motion and the woman who sued the troopers appealed. We hold that the commissioner’s refusal to indemnify the troopers was a…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dietz v. Dodge CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  2. Minnesota Center for Environmental Advocacy v. Metropolitan CouncilSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1999
  3. Meath v. Harmful Substance Compensation BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  4. Kulinski v. Medtronic Bio-Medicus, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  5. Shaw v. Board of Regents of the University of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1999

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chad Nelson, Below v. Troy Schlener, Carla Brown, Below, Minnesota Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2015
  2. County of Martin v. Minnesota Counties Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API