Legal Opinion
Perkins v. City of Rajneeshpuram
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 13, 1984No. 83-094 & 83-095; CA A31157PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRichardson, P. J.
Petitioner City of Rajneeshpuram appeals and respondents cross-appeal from a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order that reversed the city’s annexation of 119 acres of agricultural land and its contemporaneous rezoning of the land to permit urban uses on it. We affirm.
In September, 1982, the city adopted a comprehensive plan and submitted it to the Land Conservation and Development Commission for acknowledgment review. ORS 197.251. The following June, LCDC issued a continuance order determining that the city’s proposed urban growth boundary (UGB) did not comply with Goal 14. On August 24,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Benton County v. Friends of Benton CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- Thunderbird Motel, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Roth v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Ludwick v. Yamhill CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Mason v. Mountain River Estates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Perkins v. City of RajneeshpuramOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Rendler v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.