Roth v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.
Petitioners seek judicial review of that portion of an acknowledgment order issued by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC), which, according to petitioners, “enlarges the [City of] Newberg[’s] urban growth boundary [UGB] to include an 18.8 acre parcel for a proposed school site.” This case is a classic illustration of the pitfalls involved in LCDC’s simultaneously considering a goal issue in two distinct proceedings designed for different purposes: adjudicatory appeals before the Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) (in which LCDC must pass on any goal questions), and…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3Cited by12 opinions
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- Perkins v. City of RajneeshpuramOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Perkins v. City of RajneeshpuramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.