1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtJoseph, C. J.
Petitioner seeks review of LCDC’s order acknowledging the Curry County comprehensive plan and land use regulations as complying with the statewide land use planning goals. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
Petitioner argues in its first assignment of error that the criteria set forth in the plan for the identification of “commitment” exception areas are in conflict with Goal 2 and with applicable statutory and regulatory exceptions standards. LCDC answers, inter alia:
“Goal 2 provides that exceptions to the goals are treated as plan amendments. When a county amends an acknowledged plan the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Laughlin v. School District No. 1Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Perkins v. City of RajneeshpuramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- Lord v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
3Cited by10 opinions
- Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- Hale v. BellequeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2013
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Collins v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.