Legal Opinion

Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development Commission

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 5, 1983No. CA A24314PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtButtler, P. J.

Petitioners seek judicial review of the Land Conservation and Development Commission’s (LCDC) acknowledgment of the City of Elkton’s Comprehensive Plan and Implementing Measures. We affirm.

In 1980, the City presented its comprehensive plan to LCDC requesting acknowledgment pursuant to ORS 197.251. 1 LCDC continued the request for 120 days to allow the City to bring its plan into compliance with Goals 1, 2, 4-7,10-12, and 14. After additional continuances, the plan and ordinances were acknowledged by an order dated February 23,1982. Petitioners object to the acknowledgment, claiming that the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Roth v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  2. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Perkins v. City of RajneeshpuramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  4. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. MetroCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
  5. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API