Legal Opinion

Rendler v. Lincoln County

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 14, 1985No. 41260; CA A32003PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.

This is an action to vacate a county road. Appellants appeal from a trial court judgment holding that Lincoln County Road 804 (804) was properly established and never vacated or abandoned, and that the public has acquired a prescriptive easement over appellants’ land abutting 804. The issues are (1) whether the Committee to Save Yachats 804 Trail, Inc. (intervenor) had standing to intervene and seek declaratory relief, (2) whether 804 was vacated or abandoned and (3) whether the public has acquired a prescriptive easement over appellants’ land. We affirm.

In 1890, when the area in question was…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Smith v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  5. Thompson v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rendler v. Lincoln CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Motes v. PacifiCorpCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  3. Marshall v. City of YachatsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  4. Northwest Alliance for Market Equality v. Tri-County Metropolitan TransportationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  5. Murray v. City of YachatsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API