Legal Opinion

Mason v. Mountain River Estates, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 17, 1985No. 84-072; CA A34500PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNewman, J.

Mountain River Estates, Inc. (MRE), petitions for review of the Land Use Board of Appeals’ partial reversal and partial remand of Linn County’s decision that MRE has a vested right to complete a 111-unit planned unit development (PUD). LCDC and LUBA had held in earlier proceedings that the PUD could not be completed consistently with statewide land use planning goals. The issue, as formulated by the parties, is whether MRE had a “vested right” to complete the PUD, because its development activities were permitted under the applicable county ordinance before MRE was on notice of the goal…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Clackamas County v. HolmesOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Polk County v. MartinOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Forman v. Clatsop CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Gordon v. Clackamas CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. Perkins v. City of RajneeshpuramCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Friends of Yamhill County, Inc. v. Board of CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  2. McCoy v. Linn CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  3. 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
  4. Norwood v. Washington CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
  5. GUNDERSON, LLC. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API