Legal Opinion
Perkins v. City of Rajneeshpuram
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided September 17, 1985No. LUBA 83-094 and 83-095 CA A31157 SC S31065PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPeterson, C. J.
The city of Rajneeshpuram annexed 119 acres and thereafter zoned the annexed property to permit urban development. The Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) reversed the city’s annexation and contemporaneous zoning ordinances. The city appealed to the Court of Appeals, which affirmed LUBA. We affirm the Court of Appeals as modified herein.
The issue presented is this: Once a city has adopted an urban growth boundary (UGB), but before the comprehensive plan containing the UGB has been acknowledged 1 by the Land Conservation and Development Commission (LCDC) pursuant to ORS 197.251, may the city rely…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Byrd v. StringerOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Branscomb v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- City of Salem v. Families for Responsible Government, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1985
- Roth v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Curry Co.)Oregon Supreme Court · 1986
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1986
- Rendler v. Lincoln CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- 1000 Friends v. Land Conservation & Development CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- Blatt v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.