Legal Opinion

Maricopa County v. Black

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 22, 1973No. 1 CA-CIV 1919PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAIRE, Judge.

The only question presented in this appeal is whether the appellant county may lawfully require as a condition of employment that the appellees (certain employees of the county) participate in a group health and life insurance program established by the county, and whether, against the wishes of appellees, the county may withhold from their wages sums of money for payment of one-half of the premiums for the insurance.

The appellees as plaintiffs sought in-junctive relief in the trial court. After the issues were joined, the plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment, which was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  2. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Associated Dairy Products Co. v. PageArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. WainscottArizona Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Transamerica Title Insurance Co. v. Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  3. Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. Davis v. HiddenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1979
  5. Hancock v. McCarrollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API