Legal Opinion

Davis v. Hidden

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 4, 1979No. 1 CA-CIV 4365PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Judge.

At issue in this appeal is the authority of a county to deny a residential building permit on the ground that a proposed septic tank would be contrary to state law. We hold that while the county has the statutory authority to require compliance with state health laws as a predicate for the issuance of a building permit, the county in this instance has not exercised this authority by the enactment of an appropriate ordinance.

Earl Davis, appellant, owned a mobile home which was destroyed by fire. He decided to build a new single-family residence on his lot at Bermuda…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Polygon Corp. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  3. City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Yauch v. State, City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Maricopa County v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Johnson v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
  3. State v. MaupinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. Gilbert v. County of MohaveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Marsoner v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API