Davis v. Hidden
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FROEB, Judge.
At issue in this appeal is the authority of a county to deny a residential building permit on the ground that a proposed septic tank would be contrary to state law. We hold that while the county has the statutory authority to require compliance with state health laws as a predicate for the issuance of a building permit, the county in this instance has not exercised this authority by the enactment of an appropriate ordinance.
Earl Davis, appellant, owned a mobile home which was destroyed by fire. He decided to build a new single-family residence on his lot at Bermuda…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Polygon Corp. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
- Yauch v. State, City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1973
- Maricopa County v. Southern Pacific Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1945
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Wilderness World, Inc. v. Department of RevenueArizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Johnson v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2003
- State v. MaupinCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
- Gilbert v. County of MohaveCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Marsoner v. Pima CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.