Legal Opinion

Maricopa County v. Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 20, 1991No. 1 CA-CV 89-483PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

This appeal arises from a dispute over a $2.00 entrance fee charged by Maricopa County (County), and then remitted to Maricopa County Municipal Water Conservation District No. 1 (MWD), for each vehicle entering Lake Pleasant Regional Park. In 1984, the parties entered into an agreement providing that the County would collect the $2.00 fee for MWD’s benefit to help offset MWD’s spiraling costs for the operation, maintenance and safety of Waddell Dam and Camp Dyer Diversion Dam. The agreement supplemented a 1969 contract authorizing the County to manage a regional park…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Local 266, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers v. Salt River Project Agricultural Improvement & Power DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1954
  3. New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Lacer v. Navajo CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  5. City of Glendale v. WhiteArizona Supreme Court · 1948

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cutter Aviation, Inc. v. Arizona Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. City of Tucson v. RineerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  3. Hohokam Irrigation & Drainage District v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 2003
  4. Clark Equipment Co. v. Arizona Property & Casualty Insurance Guaranty FundCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. Centric-Jones Co. v. Town of MaranaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API