Legal Opinion

Butterworth v. Boyd

California Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1938No. S. F. 16017PublishedCited by 114 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

This is a petition for a writ of mandate to compel respondents, the controller and treasurer of the city and county of San Francisco, to make available to petitioners certain funds deducted from the compensation of employees and teachers in San Francisco under the Health Service System established by charter amendment in 1937.

*143The proposal to establish a system of health service for city employees, upon payment of small, fixed monthly sums, was first submitted to a referendum vote of such employees, who declared themselves in favor of it by a vote of 7,428 to 939. Thereafter the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. McAuliffe v. Mayor and Board of AldermenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Hamilton v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  4. People v. Globe Grain & Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Klench v. Board of Pension Fund CommissionersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by114 opinions

  1. Calfarm Insurance v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Fisher v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984
  4. Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Miller v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977

109 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API