Legal Opinion

Hancock v. McCarroll

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided December 24, 1996No. 1 CA-CV 96-0104PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CHRISTOPHER M. SKELLY, Judge. 1

Appellant Ernest Hancock applied for initiative petition serial numbers for initiatives which would repeal a county resolution that created a stadium district, and repeal the stadium district’s levy of a transaction privilege tax. When the clerk of the county board of supervisors and stadium district refused to issue the requested petition numbers, Hancock filed special actions in superi- or court seeking orders directing her to do so. The superior court dismissed the consolidated special actions. We affirm.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

In 1990, the Arizona…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Jett v. City of TucsonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Mohave County v. Mohave-Kingman Estates, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Board of Control v. BucksteggeArizona Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Maricopa County v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Cypress on Sunland Homeowners Ass'n v. OrlandiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  3. Southwest Gas Corp. v. Mohave CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Robertson v. GrazianoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  5. CYPRESS ON SUNLAND HOMEOWNERS, ASS'N. v. OrlandiniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API