Legal Opinion

Associated Dairy Products Co. v. Page

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided June 6, 1949No. 5158PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHELPS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a declaratory judgment of the Superior Court of Cochise County involving the validity of an ordinance enacted by the board of supervisors of said county designated as a “Public Health Service Milk Ordinance.” The question presented for the determination of the court is: Did the board of supervisors have the authority under the law to enact said ordinance?

The facts in the case are that the board of supervisors enacted said ordinance on August 4, 1947, the purpose clause thereof being as follows: “An ordinance defining ‘milk’ and certain ‘milk products’,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Arizona Ex Rel. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Bowman v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Hall v. DeCuirSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Southern Pac. Co. v. State of Arizona Ex Rel. Sullivan, Attorney General of ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Board of Commissioners v. AllmanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Hart v. Bayless Investment & Trading CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1959
  2. State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. State Ex Rel Brnovich v. City of tucson/dewitArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. HOME BUILDERS ASS'N v. City of MaricopaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  5. Loftus v. RussellArizona Supreme Court · 1949

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API