State Highway Commission v. Phillips
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Denny, E.J.
We think it is apparent from the record that the court below excluded the defendants’ evidence with respect to the existence of a road at the time of the taking, over which these defendants had access to their premises, because the access road, if any, was not a State-maintained public highway.
After the court had sustained the plaintiff’s objection to the defendants’ proffered evidence with respect to the existence of a road which was, according to the defendants’ proffered evidence, in existence at the time of the taking, the court, among other things, dictated for the record: “*…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Warren v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1958
- Rouse v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Abernathy v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- Wofford v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Kirkman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
- State Highway Commission v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Terrell v. H & N CHEVROLET COMPANYCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
- Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- Department of Transportation v. ByrumCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.