Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Byrum

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 15, 1986No. 862SC74PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JOHNSON, Judge.

In defendants’ sole Assignment of Error, they contend the court committed reversible error by ruling that the expert testimony of Jack A. Williford was inadmissible for the purpose of establishing fair market value of the land at issue. Specifically, defendants contend that the capitalization of income approach utilized by Mr. Williford as his method of appraisal is a proper method in determining fair market value in condemnation cases. We disagree and find defendants’ reliance upon two recent decisions from this Court, Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. King, 75 N.C. App.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Highway Commission v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Kirkman v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Board of Transportation v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  4. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. KingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
  5. City of Kings Mountain v. ClineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. City of Statesville v. CloaningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  3. Department of Transportation v. FlemingCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  4. City of Charlotte v. HurlaheCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2006
  5. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API