State Highway Commission v. Yarborough
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtGraham, J.
The trial court did not instruct the jury that they were not to consider the question of interest in determining damages since it would be added by the court to their verdict. No special request was made for such an instruction but the plaintiff nevertheless insists that the court’s failure to so charge was error.
Since the enactment of G.S. 136-113 in 1959, it has been the duty of the court to add interest to an award of damages for the taking of property pursuant to Chapter 136 of the General Statutes. Prior to that time, it was the jury’s function to award interest as just compensation for…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Barnes v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- North Carolina State Highway Commission v. NucklesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- Hedrick v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
- Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Abernathy v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Shaklee v. Board of County Com'rs of Weld CountySupreme Court of Colorado · 1971
- Haymore v. North Carolina State Highway CommissionCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
- Department of Transportation v. CraineCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- State Highway Commission v. FryCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
- Dep't of Transp. v. BB & R, LLCCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.