Legal Opinion

Department of Transportation v. Rowe

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 20, 2001No. 506A98-2PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORR, Justice.

This dispute arose from the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) decision to build a road connecting U.S. Highway 70-321 to an interchange on Interstate 40 in Catawba County. To acquire land for this project, the DOT exercised its authority under N.C.G.S. § 136-18 to condemn 11.411 acres of defendants’ 18.123-acre tract. As required by statute, the DOT acquired defendants’ property by filing a declaration of taking and asking for a determination of just compensation. At trial, the presiding judge instructed the jury as to the requirements of N.C.G.S. §…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  5. Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  3. Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API