Department of Transportation v. Rowe
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ORR, Justice.
This dispute arose from the North Carolina Department of Transportation’s (“DOT”) decision to build a road connecting U.S. Highway 70-321 to an interchange on Interstate 40 in Catawba County. To acquire land for this project, the DOT exercised its authority under N.C.G.S. § 136-18 to condemn 11.411 acres of defendants’ 18.123-acre tract. As required by statute, the DOT acquired defendants’ property by filing a declaration of taking and asking for a determination of just compensation. At trial, the presiding judge instructed the jury as to the requirements of N.C.G.S. §…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Craig v. BorenSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Olson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2004
- Toomer v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Stephenson v. BartlettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Augur v. AugurSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
- Rhyne v. K-Mart Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.