Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority v. King

ARNOLD, Judge.

This is a condemnation case. The issue at trial was just compensation. The plaintiff now seeks a new trial on the grounds that the trial judge committed prejudicial error by admitting certain evidence submitted by defendants for the purpose of establishing the fair market value of defendants’ land. We find no error in the trial judge’s evidentiary rulings.

Plaintiff first assigns as error the trial judge’s admission of the testimony of defendant Mary King as to the revenues and expenses of the parking business operated on the 3.6 acres at issue in this case. Plaintiff argues that…