Legal Opinion

Rouse v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided October 12, 1910PublishedCited by 35 opinions

Indictment for murder. Before Judge Park. Worth superior court'. March 2, 1910.

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, J.

1. There being no statute prescribing the weight which shall be given to the testimony of an expert, what consideration such evidence is entitled to is a question solely for the jury.(a) Under the principle announced in the preceding note, the following charge was error: “When the experience, honesty, and impartiality of the expert is undoubted' by the jury, his testimony is entitled to great weight. It is not, however, so authoritative that the jury is bound to be governed by it. It is advisory merely, and such testimony is intended to assist you in coming to a correct conclusion.” Smith v.…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Warrick v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. BrownSupreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Golatt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1908
  4. Bourquin v. BourquinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  5. Ryder v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Adsitt v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1981
  2. Boyd v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Manley v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1928
  4. Vincent v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Lynn v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API