Legal Opinion

Kirkman v. State Highway Commission

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 15, 1962No. 378PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaep, J.

Respondent’s first assignment of error is to the failure of the trial judge to strike the evidence of Dr. O. L. Joyner, witness for the petitioners, who testified that in his opinion the property in question was worth $80,000.00 before the access to new 421 was taken and only $45,000.00 to $50,000.00 thereafter. On cross-examination he said that in arriving at his valuations he had taken into consideration the fact that the property was less valuable for motel and restaurant purposes after access had been lost to the new highway because the barricade resulted in a loss of business. Neither…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Templeton v. State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  4. Pemberton v. City of GreensboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
  5. Prudential Insurance v. Central Nebraska Public Power & Irrigation DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Department of Transportation v. M.M. Fowler, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 2006
  2. Department of Transportation v. RoweSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2001
  3. North Carolina Board of Transportation v. RandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. City of Statesville v. CloaningerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1992
  5. State Highway Commission v. YarboroughCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API