Legal Opinion

Terrell v. H & N CHEVROLET COMPANY

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 26, 1971No. 713DC148PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MALLARD, Chief Judge.

After the plaintiff put on his evidence and rested, the defendant made a motion for a directed verdict; and at the close of all the evidence, the defendant again made a motion for a directed verdict. After the verdict the defendant made five motions including one for judgment notwithstanding the verdict. All of these motions were denied. None were properly made because none of them incorporated the rule number under which movant was proceeding. See Rule 6 of the “General Rules of Practice for the Superior and District Courts Supplemental to Rules of Civil Procedure…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cutts v. CaseySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Chisholm v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  3. Millers Mutual Insurance Ass'n of Illinois v. Atkinson Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Rea v. . SimowitzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946
  5. Morris v. TateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Colony Associates Ex Rel. Watson v. Fred L. Clapp & Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  2. Strang v. HollowellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  3. Brown v. ScismCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Neff v. Queen City Coach Co.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972
  5. Dobson v. HoneycuttCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API