Legal Opinion
Crowley v. Barnhart
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 2, 2002No. 6:01-cv-06313PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, Chief Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security [hereinafter “Commissioner”] that plaintiff, Gary Crowley, was not disabled under the Social Security Act and therefore, was not entitled to benefits. Plaintiff, Gary Crowley, applied for Social Security disability insurance benefits in January 2000. (T. 78-80.) 2 Plaintiff alleged that he was unable to work because he suffered from severe diabetes mellitus 3 and an anxiety disorder due to the diabetes 4 . (T. 94.)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ellen Melville v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Maria TEJADA, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Kenneth S. APFEL, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Walter E. Parker v. Patricia Roberts Harris, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Perez v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Williams v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2006
- Aragon-Lemus v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Youney v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2003
- Adamski v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.