Legal Opinion
Youney v. Barnhart
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 6, 2003No. 6:02-cv-06328PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
I. Procedural Posture
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”), who determined that Joanne M. Youney (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under the Social Security Act (“the Act”) and, therefore, is not entitled to benefits. Plaintiff applied for benefits under Titles II and XVI of the Act on March 6, 2000 claiming that she was disabled as a result of a work-related accident which occurred on December 13, 1999 (T. 72-74). 1 Her application was denied both…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Matejka v. BarnhartDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2005
- Hogan v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2007