Legal Opinion
Adamski v. Barnhart
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided December 23, 2005No. 03-CV-6508LPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Richard M. Adamski (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) or Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits.
Both the Commissioner and plaintiff have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Licata v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2021