Legal Opinion

Perez v. Barnhart

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided July 20, 2006No. 03-CV-6246LPublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

INTRODUCTION

This action was brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that plaintiff Angel Perez is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to disability insurance and supplemental security income benefits.

Both the Commissioner and plaintiff have moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(c). For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s motion is granted, plaintiffs motion is denied, and the…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Coger v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
  2. Wynn v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
  3. Pollino v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
  4. Vay v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018
  5. Kelsey v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec.District Court, W.D. New York · 2018

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API