Legal Opinion
Williams v. Commissioner of Social Security
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided April 3, 2006No. 04-CV-6227LPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. §§ 405(g) and 1383(c) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Shirley Williams (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under the Social Security Act, and therefore, is not entitled to Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”) or Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) benefits.
The Commissioner has moved for judgment on the pleadings pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). For the reasons discussed below, the Commissioner’s motion (Dkt.# 14)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ysabel Rosa v. John S. Callahan, Acting Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Crysler v. AstrueDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2008
- Albidrez v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Acevedo v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Hanchett v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- Annarino v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.