Legal Opinion
Aragon-Lemus v. Barnhart
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided August 7, 2003No. 6:02-cv-06399PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
LARIMER, District Judge.
I. Procedural Posture
This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to review the final determination of the Commissioner of Social Security (“the Commissioner”) that Paula Aragon-Lemus (“plaintiff’) is not disabled under the Social Security Act (“the Act”) and, therefore, is not entitled to benefits. Plaintiff applied for benefits under Title XVI of the Act on June 28,1996 (T. 70, 72-85). 1 Her application was denied both initially, (T. 48-51), and upon reconsideration (T. 54-57). Plaintiff requested a hearing by an Administrative Law Judge…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Sims v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rita Schaal v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security, 1 Dockets 96-6212, 96-6316Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Ronald E. Veino, Sr. v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Farnham v. AstrueDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011
- Ellis v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2014
- Rojas Mamani v. Sanchez BerzainDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Britt v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2020
- Hoffman v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2023