Legal Opinion
Hadland v. NN Investors Life Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 13, 1994No. G012705PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SONENSHINE, J.
NN Investors Life Insurance Company, Inc. (NN), National Association for the Self-Employed (NASE), Kevin E. Winn, Winn & Associates, Bob Winn, United Group Association, Inc., and Aegon USA, Inc. (referred to collectively as defendants, except where individual identification is necessary), appeal from an adverse judgment following jury trial of an action brought by Mary Jane Hadland and Fred Hadland to recover damages arising from an insurance dispute. Defendants contend a multitude of errors committed by the trial court mandate reversal. The Hadlands have filed a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- Royal Globe Insurance v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1990
- Hackethal v. National Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- Sarchett v. Blue Shield of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Spray, Gould & Bowers v. Associated International InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Hoffman v. 162 North Wolfe CA6California Court of Appeal · 2014
- Butcher v. Truck Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- Chase v. Blue Cross of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Paper Savers, Inc. v. NacsaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.