Butcher v. Truck Insurance Exchange
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DAU, J. *
Insureds, facing suit for malicious prosecution, turned to their insurer for a defense, having years before instructed the insurer’s agent to duplicate the. coverage of a policy containing that protection. When the defense was denied, because the coverage was not in the policy that was issued and later renewed, the insureds sued. Insureds produced evidence that the insurer’s agent misled them into believing he had delivered a policy duplicating the coverages (including coverage for malicious prosecution) of an insurer whose policy was not being renewed. The trial court granted…
2Cases cited64 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- MacEy v. Allstate Property & Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Hydro-Mill Co. v. Hayward, Tilton & Rolapp Insurance Associates, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- Buschman v. Anesthesia Business Consultants LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Zevnik v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- R & B Auto Center, Inc. v. Farmers Group, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.