Legal Opinion
Blankenheim v. E. F. Hutton & Co.
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 15, 1990No. H004920PublishedCited by 63 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COTTLE, J.
Henry J. Blankenheim and Philip L. Kaefer purchased limited partnership interests in three computer research and development firms and stock in the corporation marketing the partnerships’ software. After the investments became worthless, they sued, among others, E. F. Hutton, the stock brokerage firm that sold them their interests, and Hutton’s sales representative, F. Sanford Frederickson. E. F. Hutton & Company, Inc., and Frederickson moved for summary judgment and the court granted their motion, ruling that (1) plaintiffs’ reliance on Frederickson’s representations was…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moyer v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
- Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Gagne v. BertranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- AARTS Productions, Inc. v. Crocker National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- Seeger v. OdellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by63 opinions
- Alliance Mortgage Co. v. RothwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
- Texaco, Inc., Plaintiff-Counter-Claim-Defendant-Appellant v. William R. Ponsoldt, Defendant-Counter-Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- OCM Principal Opportunities Fund, L.P. v. CIBC World Markets Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2007
- Chatton v. National Union Fire InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- McClain v. Octagon Plaza, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.